It is generally believed that the immune
system evolved as the host’s defense against
infectious agents, and it is well known that
patients with deficiencies in the immune
system generally succumb to these infectious
diseases
An immune response may be conveniently
divided into two parts:
(1) a specifi c
response to a given antigen and
(2) a more
nonspecifi c augmentation to that response.
An important feature of the specific
response is that there is a quicker response
to the antigen during a second exposure to
that antigen. It is the memory of the initial
response that provides the booster effect.
For convenience, the specific immune
response may be divided into two parts:
(1) the humoral response and
(2) the cellular
response to a given antigen. As we shall
see, however, both responses are mediated
through the lymphocyte. Humoral
responses are antibodies produced in response to a given antigen, and these antibodies
are proteins, have similar structures,
and can be divided into various classes of
immunoglobulins. Cellular responses are
established by cells and can only be transferred
by cells.
Up to the 1940s the general dogma
held that only antibodies were involved in
the immune response. Dr. Merrill Chase,
who began his experiments in a laboratory
devoted primarily to the humoral
response, clearly showed in a series of elegant
experiments that immunity was not
just humoral but that a cellular response
by the lymphocytes could also produce
immunity. Some of the best examples of
the power of cellular immunity may be
found in the many experiments in which
transfer of cells can induce autoimmune
disease in animals and humans as well as
rejection of an organ graft in both animals
and humans by cells.
The separation of human and cellular
immunity was further advanced by the
study of immuno deficient humans and
animals. For example, thymectomized or
congenitally athymic animals as well as
humans cannot carry out graft rejection,
yet they are capable of producing some
antibody responses. The reverse is also
true. Children (and animals) who have an
immune defi cit in the humoral response
do not make antibodies but can reject grafts and appear to handle viral, fungal,
and some bacterial infections quite well.
An extraordinary fi nding by Good and
colleagues in studying the cloacal lymphoid
organ in chickens revealed that,
with removal of the bursa Fabricius, these
animals lost their ability to produce antibodies
and yet retained the ability to reject
grafts.
Out of these and many other contributions,
a clearer picture of the division of
efforts by lymphocytes begins to emerge.
Since cellular immune responses require an
intact thymus, cellular immune responses
are mediated through the T lymphocytes
(thymus), while antibody-producing cells,
which are dependent on the bone marrow
(the bursa equivalent), are known as
B (bursa) cells.
Several types of molecules play a vital
role in the immune response, and we will
deal with each in detail. Antigens, both
foreign and self, are substances that may
or may not provoke an immune response.
Both T cells and B cells have receptors that
recognize these antigens. In the case of B
cells, antibodies on the surface are a major
source (but not the only one) of antigen recognition,
and once activated, they differentiate
into plasma cells that produce large
quantities of antibodies that are secreted
into blood and body fluids to block the
harmful effects of the antigen.
T cells have similar receptors known
as T-cell receptors (TCR), and in the context
of the major histocompatibility complex
(MHC) molecules provide a means of
self-recognition and T-lymphocyte effector
functions. Often these effector functions are carried out by messages transmitted
between these cells. These soluble messengers
are called interleukins or cytokines.
No comments:
Post a Comment