Skin tests are used in addition to a directed history and physical exam to exclude or confirm IgE-mediated diseases such
as allergic rhinitis, asthma, and anaphylaxis to aeroallergens, foods, insect venoms, and certain drugs. There are two types
of skin testing used in clinical practice. These include percutaneous testing (prick or puncture) and intracutaneous testing
(intradermal). Prick testing involves introducing a needle into the upper layers of the skin through a drop of allergen
extract and gently lifting the epidermis up. Other devices are available for prick testing. Intracutaneous (intradermal)
testing involves injecting a small amount of allergen (0.01–0.02 mL) into the dermis. The release of preformed histamine
from mast cells causes increased vascular permeability via smooth muscle contraction and development of a wheal;
inflammatory mediators initiate a neural reflex causing vasodilatation, leading to erythema (the flare). Prick testing
methods are the initial technique for detecting the presence of IgE. They may correlate better with clinical sensitivity and
are more specific but less sensitive than intradermal testing. Sites of skin testing include the back and the volar aspect
of the arm. Although the back is more reactive, the difference is minimal. By skin testing on the arm, the patient can
witness the emergence and often sense the pruritus of the skin test reaction. Because more patients are sensitized (have
IgE antibodies and positive skin test reactions) than have current symptoms, the diagnosis of allergy can be made only
by correlating skin testing results with the presence of clinical symptoms.
Skin tests are used in addition to a directed history
and physical exam to exclude or confirm IgEmediated
diseases1 such as allergic rhinitis,2 asthma,3
and anaphylaxis4 to aeroallergens,5 foods,6 insect venoms,7
and certain drugs.8 Skin testing attempts to detect
the presence of allergen-specific IgE bound to mast
cells by eliciting mast cell degranulation to the specific
allergen being tested. This may help confirm the suspicion
that a patient’s symptoms are related to immediate
hypersensitivity to this allergen. Currently, two
types of skin testing are used in clinical practice. These
include percutaneous testing (prick or puncture) and
intracutaneous testing (intradermal). Prick testing involves
introducing a needle into the upper layers of the
skin through a drop of allergen extract and gently
lifting the epidermis up. Several other percutaneous
skin testing implements are available commercially.
Intracutaneous (intradermal) testing involves injecting a small amount of allergen (0.01–0.02 mL) into the
dermis.
Prick testing methods are the initial technique for
detecting the presence of IgE. They may correlate better
with clinical sensitivity and are more specific but
less sensitive than intradermal testing.9–11 In addition,
intradermal testing carries a slightly higher risk of a
systemic reaction (0.05% versus 0.03% for a prick test),
although the risk is still low. Because of this risk,
testing should begin with prick testing, and then proceed
to intradermal testing if prick testing is negative
and there remains a high degree of clinical suspicion.
In the past 30 years, six fatalities have been attributed
to intradermal testing; five of these patients had
asthma and a lack of prior prick testing. One fatality
from prick testing has ever been identified; this patient
received over 90 prick tests to food allergens at one
time and had preexisting asthma.12 Intradermal testing
has not proven beneficial in the diagnosis of food allergy;
therefore, the risk to patients is not justified. A
physician should always be available to give emergency
treatment if necessary, and patients should be
observed for at least 20 minutes after testing
H1-receptor antagonists should be held for a minimum
of 24–72 hours before skin testing based on the
specific pharmacokinetics of each drug. Other drugs
with antihistaminic properties, such as metoclopramide, histamine-2 receptor blockers, and tricyclic antidepressants,
may affect test results and should be held
before testing if possible.13 Refer to Table 1 for the
elimination half-lives (t 1⁄2) of several commonly prescribed
medications. Short courses of oral corticosteroids
will not affect testing results; however, topical
corticosteroids may decrease or inhibit skin reactivity.
These should not be applied to the test site for at least
1 week before testing. Patients receiving immunotherapy
may have decreased skin reactivity. Leukotriene
antagonists do not significantly affect skin test reactivity.
2-Adrenergic agonists, decongestants, theophylline,
and cromolyn will not affect skin testing
Sites of skin testing include the back and the volar
aspect of the arm. Although the back is more reactive,
the significance of this is minimal.10 Use of the arm as
the test site has the advantage of being able to place a
tourniquet above the site should a systemic reaction
occur. Skin chosen for testing should be clear of dermatitisThe skin chosen is cleaned with alcohol. Allergen
extracts, positive control (histamine), and negative control
(saline or allergen diluent) are placed 2–5 cm apart.
One source of skin testing error is placing sites too
close together resulting in spread of one allergen extract
to another site and inability to accurately record
the extent of erythema from two positive sites close
together. False negative or positive reactions may occur
with insufficient or excessive skin penetration. If
prick testing reveals minimal or equivocal reaction to
an allergen, one might choose to proceed with intradermal testing with a 100- to 1000-fold dilution of
allergen extract.
Standardized extracts should be used to facilitate
comparisons between clinicians. Note that use of standardized
doses does not always confer equal potency.
One study found that the content of major allergen
varied significantly among the 12 standardized extracts
tested. Extracts should be refrigerated at 4°C.
They should contain glycerin to decrease the loss of
potency that occurs with time
Testing should be graded within 15–20 minutes.15
Several different grading systems exist, one of which is
shown in Table 2. The mean diameter of the wheal and
erythema are recorded with the presence or absence of
pseudopodia. Physicians should quantitate the actual
size on the data sheet and not solely a grade so that
results might be better shared among practitioners.
Clinicians also are urged to use a comprehensive data
sheet recording the brand of extract, dilutions used,
device chosen, mean diameters of wheal and erythema,
and specific grading system key.
Interpretation of skin tests may be more difficult in
patients with dermatographism. False positive reactions
with dermatographism can be distinguished from
true positive reactions that are secondary to IgE because
the former fade more quickly. Special attention
should be paid to the difference between the sizes of
the reactions from allergen extracts compared with the
negative control. No significant differences in skin test
reactivity have been noted for gender. Infants and the
elderly, however, may have decreased skin reactivity
and thus smaller wheal size. Additionally, darkly pigmented
skin can have larger histamine wheals compared
with light skin.
No comments:
Post a Comment